|
OMVC
Mobile DTV Field Testing
Mobile DTV
is a consumer service offering users a direct feed of broadcast
television programming through a variety of wireless mobile devices.
Promoted in the U.S. by the Open Mobile Video Coalition (OMVC) and
others, Mobile DTV is rolling out in numerous markets throughout
the country. The OMVC, a coalition of commercial and public broadcasters,
worked with ATSC in developing the DTV standard that paved the way
for commercial deployment of the service. Since adoption of the
standard, the OMVC has sponsored field testing of Mobile DTV to
gain a better understanding of how Mobile DTV signals perform in
different environments. The field tests also help determine operating
parameters that will result in the best coverage and viewer experience.
OMVC field
tests have been conducted in a number of U.S. cities, as shown in
the table to the right. Each city offered an opportunity to test
one or more of the parameters of interest as illustrated. All of
these tests have been completed except for the ones in Dallas/Houston
which are still underway. Listed below are some major findings and
observations from these tests for each of the different performance
categories:
- Different reception conditions: Not surprisingly, mobile
DTV performance is directly affected by signal level. Multipath
(i.e., complexity of echoes and Doppler) did not significantly
affect performance. Mobile DTV signal reception using a fixed
outdoor antenna was very good in Washington, D.C., San Francisco
and Atlanta (within a 30-mile radius of the transmitters). The
system did not perform as well in Seattle (terrain and urbanization
contributed to reception failures and shortfall).
- Pedestrian and indoors: Reception for pedestrian operation
using a mobile DTV-equipped phone with extendable antenna was
achievable for signal levels equal to or greater than -62 dBm
for mixed rate and -64 dBm for 1/4 rate (Rate refers
to Turbo coding rate, one of the parameters varied during the
tests. Turbo coding is an error-correcting coding technique used
to increase signal robustness.) These findings were true whether
the measurements were taken indoors or outdoors, walking or stationary.
Occasionally, failures in reception occurred at signal levels
higher than -62 dBm.
- Different Turbo coding rates: The 1/4 rate Turbo code
performed slightly better than the mixed rate Turbo code. The
3.5 to 4 dB improvement in White Noise reception threshold measured
in the lab (for 1/4 rate compared to mixed rate codes) translated
into a 3 to 5% improvement in coverage area in the field. The
1/2 rate Turbo code did not perform as well.
- Multiple channel operation: Mobile reception of different
RF channels operating from different transmitter locations looked
very promising. This was especially true if the transmitters were
within a reasonable distance of each other and were operating
at comparable power and height. The data also suggest that a multi-channel
pedestrian service would be more difficult to achieve than for
mobile service.
- VHF reception:
Currently there is not enough data to evaluate mobile DTV
performance at VHF. More testing of this parameter is currently
underway.
- On-channel repeater:This improved the overall mobile
DTV reception, especially indoors. Mobile DTV devices were able
to demodulate the more complex echoes generated by the repeater.
Failures occurred in a few instances where the repeater signal
level was between zero and 4 dB above the main signal. The on-channel
repeater had a more significant impact on 8-VSB legacy receivers
(i.e., non-mobile DTV receivers). Failures occurred in many instances
where the repeater signal level was between zero and 8 dB above
the main signal, and the failures varied significantly depending
on the make and model of the 8-VSB legacy device.
- RF captures: Some RF signals were captured
in the field then directly fed (using coax) into prototype receivers
in the lab. Depending on the complexity of the echoes in the RF
capture, the reception threshold for the directly-fed signals
ranged from -78 to -84 dBm. The same signals received in the field
using a mobile phone with a built-in mobile DTV receiver and antenna
showed a threshold penalty of 15 to 20 dB. This is probably attributable
to the random orientation of the receive antenna and the overall
performance of the mobile DTV-equipped phones receiving
system.
Additional
information about OMVC mobile DTV field testing is available in
an archived webcast
that was conducted by Broadcast Engineering magazine on
July 27, 2011. Featured in this webcast are NABs Victor Tawil,
senior vice president in the Technology Department, and Charles
Cooper, principal with the broadcast consulting engineering firm
of du Treil, Lundin & Rackley. Also discussed in the webcast
is a new prediction model for mobile and handheld Mobile DTV service.
|